Monday, April 9, 2007

Reset Brookstone Tsa Combination

Want to climb? A province in China advises parents pamper

03/26/2007

The controversy over the UN

anti-Semites accused the Jews of racist

John Dugard accused by the report to the UN on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A recent United Nations report plasma rampant anti-Semitism that has taken control of the human rights machinery of the UN. In language reminiscent of Nazi Germany, John Dugard, the "Special Envoy for the human rights situation in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967" the UN has announced that Jews seek racial domination.

In Dugard's words, "the Israeli army caused serious bodily and mental harm on Palestinians. [...] For the Palestinians throughout the OPT [occupied Palestinian territories] are denied freedom of movement. Can you seriously be denied that The purpose of this measure is to establish and maintain domination by one racial group (Jews) over another racial group (Palestinians) and systematically oppressing them? "

What Dugard fears most is not terrorism and hatred that feeds it, but "Jewishness," the idea that a Jewish resident on land claimed by Arabs. Copying deliberately the Nazi imagery, his report refers to Israel's security barrier in this way: "The Wall being built in East Jerusalem is an instrument of social engineering designed to achieve the Jewishness of Jerusalem." The problem of "Jewishness" is displayed side by side with the defender at the UN of the Hamas Government. According to Dugard, Israel has no right to freeze the transfer of funds to the Hamas government. Why? "Predictably, Israel justifies its actions on security grounds, but the real reason seems to be the determination to bring about regime change." A look at the Hamas Charter helps to determine the wisdom of regime change: "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will bend. There is no solution to the Palestinian issue does not pass through Jihad." But according to this UN expert the problem is not a government dedicated to killing Jews but the Jews themselves. For years the occupation of Palestine and apartheid in South Africa drew the attention of the international community. In 1994, apartheid came to an end [...] the OPT has become a test for the West, a test to assess their commitment to human rights. If the West stops the test, can hardly be expected that developing countries take seriously the human rights violations in their own countries. Thus, the UN reverses good and evil. Why should Sudan stop genocide? You have to wait for the Jews repent of their Jewishness and the Jewishness of Israel is buttoned. Why should Zimbabwe stop murdering and starving his own people, black and white? Why should China tolerate the freedom of expression? Why should Saudi Arabia to allow women to leave the house without a man or occupy any front seat? Why should Egypt stop the mutilation of the genitalia of most of its female population married? If everyone is waiting for a solution to the Jewish! Mellila

0 comments:

Post a Comment

The main argument of the UN outpost of modern anti-Semitism is to pillory the Jew calling him the supreme racist. Israel would be the evil equivalent to apartheid South Africa. It refers, in fact, apartheid on 24 occasions throughout the report, claiming that "the laws and practices of Israel in the OPT certainly resemble aspects of apartheid." As expected, fails to mention that one fifth of the population of Israel is Arab citizens who vote and have representatives in the Israeli parliament, while Arab countries are Judenrein. What is that Israel is the apartheid state? The final proof that Dugard is only an anti-Semite is funded by the UN as blaming the Jewish state for all the ills of the world:
Source: The Telegram